Hazard assessment module

From InfoEx Help Information
Revision as of 12:44, 28 December 2013 by Pascal (talk | contribs) (Step 1: Avalanche problems)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
REQUIREMENTS
Permission Submission moderator and higher
Connectivity Online and partial offline

This document describes the functionality of the 'hazard assessment' workflow module and how to properly configure if for a workflow.

Required permissions:

Required connectivity:

  • You need to be online to create a new or edit an existing workflow template.
  • You need to be online to initiate a workflow instance for the fields to be properly prefilled from the last workflow instance with the same location(s). Once the workflow instance has been loaded, you can complete the workflow on an offline mode.
  • You can initiate a workflow instance when you are offline, but none of the fields will be prefilled and you will start with an completely blank copy.
  • You need to be online to submit your observations and assessments to the InfoEx at the end of your workflow.

Functionality

The hazard assessment workflow module allows users to assessment avalanche hazard according to the conceptual model of avalanche hazard developed by Grant Statham and his colleagues. The hazard assessment process consists of two steps:

  1. Identifying the present avalanche problems and characterizing their condition using a hazard chart
  2. Assessing the overall hazard given the existing avalanche problems

If you are not interested in the highly structured approach of the conceptual model of avalanche hazard, the Hazard comment module offers a low-tech alternative that allows you to enter a free-form description of the current avalanche problems and the resulting avalanche hazard. It is only possible to have either a single hazard assessment or a single hazard comment step in your workflow, not both.

The data entry fields of this workflow module are automatically pre-populated with the last snowpack and PWL information that was submitted to the InfoEx for the location(s) associated with the workflow.

NOTE If you have multiple workflows for a location (e.g., AM and PM meetings), the information is pre-populated from the last time you submitted any workflow for the location. For example, in a regular rotation, the snowpack step in the PM meeting is pre-populated with information from the AM meeting and the next AM meeting is pre-populated with information from the PM meeting of the previous day.

Any workflow template with a hazard assessment module step will automatically have a Context module step added at the beginning of the workflow.

Any workflow template with a hazard assessment module step will automatically have a Workflow summary step added at the end of the workflow. This summary allows users to review their observations and assessments before they are submitted to the InfoEx.

The assessments submitted to the InfoEx via the hazard assessment module are associated with the location specified in the entry form of the individual observation.

It is possible to complete the hazard assessment step in a workflow without internet connectivity.

Layout

Fig. 1: Hazard assessment workflow module step 1: Avalanche problems
Fig. 2: Hazard assessment workflow module step 2: Avalanche hazard
Fig. 3: Hazard assessment workflow module settings

The hazard assessment workflow module consists of two steps:

Step 1: Avalanche problems

The first step of the hazard assessment module allows you to identify and characterize the current avalanche problems according the the Conceptual model of avalanche hazard developed by Grant Statham and his colleagues.

Click on Add Av Problem to add a new avalanche problem. The new problem is added to the top of the list of existing avalanche problems.

Characterize the avalanche problem:

  • Character (mandatory)
    Select the character of the avalanche problem from the available options in the dropdown list. See Avalanche character definition table for more information on avalanche problems.
  • Location (mandatory)
    Indicate in which elevation band and aspect sectors the particular avalanche problem is present using the aspect-elevation rose diagram. The most inner circle represents the alpine, the most outer circle below treeline, and the circle in the middle treeline. Turn the segments on or off by clicking on them.
NOTE Right-click on the segments to access the additional options for filling out the diagram (e.g., all aspect for an elevation band; all elevation band for an aspect; all segments)
  • Sensitivity to Trigger (mandatory)
    Determine the Sensitivity to Triggers based on what kind of triggering will initiate avalanches of any size within the defined location. See Sensitivity to trigger definition table for more information on sensitivity to triggers.
  • Spatial Distribution (mandatory)
    Determine the density and distribution of the instability within the defined location.

See Spatial distribution definition table for more information on spatial distribution.

Step 2: Avalanche hazard

Settings

The hazard assessment workflow module has the following settings (Fig. 3):

  • Name
    Name of the workflow step shown in the header of the workflow. It is recommended that you choose a short name (e.g., 'Av Hzd' instead of 'Avalanche Hazard') to keep the navigation bar of the workflow as tidy as possible.
  • Elevation Bands
    Specify whether you want to rate the conditions for each elevation band (alpine, treeline, below treeline) individually or just a single, general rating. With the three elevation band setting you will be presented with three hazard charts in the second step of the assessment process (one for each elevation band); with the general setting only a single general hazard chart.
  • Stability and/or Hazard
    Specify whether you want to include stability ratings, hazard ratings, both types of ratings or no ratings at all in your assessment process.

Other workflow modules

Functionality tested by

  • Dec. 28, 2013: Pascal Haegeli