Difference between revisions of "Grouping of observations within tables"

Revision as of 16:44, 1 January 2014

This page describes how observations within a table may be grouped in InfoEx reports.

Users can group the rows of tables according to three preferences: range; operation; and, no preference.

1.

Fig. 1: How to access the grouping options

To access the grouping options click on the Layout button in the upper right corner of the 'Reports' page (Fig. 1).

2.

Fig. 2: Layout pop-up window for InfoEx reports

A dropdown box will appear offering selections for the layout, grouping, and table types for the report that will be produced (Fig.2).

3.

Fig. 3: Example of avalanche observations grouped by Range

Fig. 4: Example of avalanche observations grouped by Operation

Under 'Group By' select the grouping option of your choice. The grouping options will provide output as follows:

Range (default)
This option groups the report entries in each table by the mountain range of the location (Fig. 3). The mountain ranges are ordered in a NW to SE direction modeled after the legacy InfoEx report. Different from the legacy InfoEx reports, observations that fall into multiple mountain ranges are not shown in multiple mountain range groups, but a new group for the particular combination of mountain ranges. This prevents the duplication of observations in the report.

NOTE	The mountain range of the location is decided automatically when the location is created or edited by comparing their geometry to a baseline map of predefined mountain ranges. If the location overlaps two defined mountain ranges it will be associated with both.

Operation
This option groups the report entries in each table alphabetically by the operation name (Fig. 4). This option is useful for smaller reports (e.g., nearest neighbours) as the mountain range is less important and it saves by eliminating the operation column in the table.

ISSUE

Currently this sorting method does not sort locations alphabetically and some unexpected ordering can occur
JIRA: - SAFE-967 ( Oct 29, 2013)

None
Choosing this option eliminates the grouping within the individual tables. The entire tables are either sorted pseudo-geographically by operation (default) or by any custom sorting specified by the user.

4.

Click on the Okay button at the bottom of the layout pop-up window to commit your preferences to the system.

5.

Wait while the application retrieves the data for the new grouping format from the server and displays it in the current view.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 |-
 |class="StepNum" | 3.
-|[[File:ReportGroupedbyRange.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig. 3:Example of a report grouped by Range]] [[File:ReportGroupedbyOperation.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig. 4:Example of a report grouped by Operation]]Under 'Group By' select the grouping option of your choice. The grouping options will provide output as follows:
+|[[File:ReportGroupedbyRange.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig. 3: Example of avalanche observations grouped by Range]] [[File:ReportGroupedbyOperation.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig. 4: Example of avalanche observations grouped by Operation]]Under 'Group By' select the grouping option of your choice. The grouping options will provide output as follows:
 * '''Range''' (default)<br/>This option groups the report entries in each table by the mountain range of the location (Fig. 3). The mountain ranges are ordered in a NW to SE direction modeled after the legacy InfoEx report. Different from the legacy InfoEx reports, observations that fall into multiple mountain ranges are not shown in multiple mountain range groups, but a new group for the particular combination of mountain ranges. This prevents the duplication of observations in the report.
 {{note|The mountain range of the location is decided automatically when the location is created or edited by comparing their geometry to a baseline map of predefined mountain ranges. If the location overlaps two defined mountain ranges it will be associated with both.|NoteWithImage}}